Family Law Education Network

Tag: Self-represented Litigant

Helmold & Mariya (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC1A 163

With the use of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) on the rise it is imperative that if is used in proceedings it is so used with great caution. Although the case of Helmold & Mariya (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC1A 163 relates to the use of AI by a self-represented party, it is nonetheless a cautionary tale.

| Read More

Oberon & Aquila (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC2F 400

This was a judgment from one of our more recent Division 2 appointments, Judge Colquhoun. Her Honour had made property settlement Orders on 7 February 2024 (“the 2024 Orders”) however, the parties were now in dispute as to the interpretation of one of those Orders – The Trustee is empowered to take possession of the [Suburb C] property and require vacant possession in order to effect a sale of the [Suburb C] property.

| Read More

Helmold & Mariya (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC1A 163

With the use of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) on the rise it is imperative that if is used in proceedings it is so used with great caution. Although the case of Helmold & Mariya (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC1A 163 relates to the use of AI by a self-represented party, it is nonetheless a cautionary tale.

| Read More

Oberon & Aquila (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC2F 400

This was a judgment from one of our more recent Division 2 appointments, Judge Colquhoun. Her Honour had made property settlement Orders on 7 February 2024 (“the 2024 Orders”) however, the parties were now in dispute as to the interpretation of one of those Orders – The Trustee is empowered to take possession of the [Suburb C] property and require vacant possession in order to effect a sale of the [Suburb C] property.

| Read More